• progress_activity cloud_sync

    Reconnection to the server…

    Movim cannot talk with the server, please try again later

  • back_to_tab fullscreen tile_small dialpad mic videocam switch_camera screen_share

    mic_none No sound detected from your microphone


    • The Guardian

      The need for independent journalism has never been greater.

      article 10000 posts • people 438 subscribers
      assignment_ind Only publishers can publish


    • Public subscriptions

    • chevron_right

      masterscreation

    • chevron_right

      Ai Yu

    • chevron_right

      metalshadow1909

    • chevron_right

      masterscreation

    • chevron_right

      Ai Yu

    • chevron_right

      metalshadow1909

    • chevron_right

      masterscreation

    • chevron_right

      Ai Yu

    • chevron_right

      metalshadow1909

  • Register Login

    Movim

    movim.chatterboxtown.us


  • rss_feed
    add Follow

    The Guardian

    people 438 subscribers • The need for independent journalism has never been greater.

    • chevron_right

      Jarvis Cocker and Mary Beard announced as Booker prize judges

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian • 11 December 2025

    The historian is set to lead a ‘stellar’ 2026 panel featuring the Pulp frontman and other acclaimed writers, as the search begins for next year’s standout work of fiction

    Pulp frontman Jarvis Cocker will feature on the 2026 Booker prize judging panel that will be chaired by the classicist and broadcaster Mary Beard.

    Novelist Patricia Lockwood has also been named as a judge, along with the poet Raymond Antrobus and Rebecca Liu, an editor at the Guardian Saturday magazine.

    Continue reading...
    • tagfiction tagfiction tagfiction tagbooks tagbooks tagbooks tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagculture tagculture tagculture tagmusic tagmusic tagmusic tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagfiction tagfiction tagfiction tagbooks tagbooks tagbooks tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagculture tagculture tagculture tagmusic tagmusic tagmusic tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagbooks tagbooks tagbooks tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagculture tagculture tagculture tagmusic tagmusic tagmusic tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagfiction tagfiction tagfiction

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • chevron_right

      Jarvis Cocker and Mary Beard announced as Booker prize judges

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian • 11 December 2025

    The historian is set to lead a ‘stellar’ 2026 panel featuring the Pulp frontman and other acclaimed writers, as the search begins for next year’s standout work of fiction

    Pulp frontman Jarvis Cocker will feature on the 2026 Booker prize judging panel that will be chaired by the classicist and broadcaster Mary Beard.

    Novelist Patricia Lockwood has also been named as a judge, along with the poet Raymond Antrobus and Rebecca Liu, an editor at the Guardian Saturday magazine.

    Continue reading...
    • tagfiction tagfiction tagfiction tagbooks tagbooks tagbooks tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagculture tagculture tagculture tagmusic tagmusic tagmusic tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagbooks tagbooks tagbooks tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagculture tagculture tagculture tagmusic tagmusic tagmusic tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagfiction tagfiction tagfiction tagbooks tagbooks tagbooks tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagculture tagculture tagculture tagmusic tagmusic tagmusic tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagfiction tagfiction tagfiction

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • chevron_right

      Jarvis Cocker and Mary Beard announced as Booker prize judges

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian • 11 December 2025

    The historian is set to lead a ‘stellar’ 2026 panel featuring the Pulp frontman and other acclaimed writers, as the search begins for next year’s standout work of fiction

    Pulp frontman Jarvis Cocker will feature on the 2026 Booker prize judging panel that will be chaired by the classicist and broadcaster Mary Beard.

    Novelist Patricia Lockwood has also been named as a judge, along with the poet Raymond Antrobus and Rebecca Liu, an editor at the Guardian Saturday magazine.

    Continue reading...
    • tagfiction tagfiction tagfiction tagbooks tagbooks tagbooks tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagculture tagculture tagculture tagmusic tagmusic tagmusic tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagbooks tagbooks tagbooks tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagculture tagculture tagculture tagmusic tagmusic tagmusic tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagfiction tagfiction tagfiction tagbooks tagbooks tagbooks tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagjarvis cocker tagculture tagculture tagculture tagmusic tagmusic tagmusic tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagbooker prize tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagawards and prizes tagfiction tagfiction tagfiction

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • chevron_right

      Weighing up the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening | Letters

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian • 11 December 2025

    Aamir Ahmed , Dr Graham Simpson , Adrian Bell and David Gollancz respond to a letter by a reader whose husband died of the disease after delaying getting a PSA test

    It is understandable for patients suffering from a late diagnosis of prostate cancer, or families who have lost loved ones, to demand that something should be done ( Letters, 5 December ). I, however, respect the UK National Screening Committee’s recommendation not to screen most men using the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test.

    The job of the committee was to weigh up the benefits and harms of any available test for routine screening. PSA testing, as a first step to diagnose cancer, results in false negatives and a significant number of false positives, meaning it has both low sensitivity and low specificity, making it a poor screening marker. PSA screening has been conducted in the US; there are varying estimates that, over three decades, it has resulted in more than 1 million patients receiving treatment (eg surgery or radiotherapy) they did not need.

    Continue reading...
    • tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • chevron_right

      Weighing up the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening | Letters

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian • 11 December 2025

    Aamir Ahmed , Dr Graham Simpson , Adrian Bell and David Gollancz respond to a letter by a reader whose husband died of the disease after delaying getting a PSA test

    It is understandable for patients suffering from a late diagnosis of prostate cancer, or families who have lost loved ones, to demand that something should be done ( Letters, 5 December ). I, however, respect the UK National Screening Committee’s recommendation not to screen most men using the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test.

    The job of the committee was to weigh up the benefits and harms of any available test for routine screening. PSA testing, as a first step to diagnose cancer, results in false negatives and a significant number of false positives, meaning it has both low sensitivity and low specificity, making it a poor screening marker. PSA screening has been conducted in the US; there are varying estimates that, over three decades, it has resulted in more than 1 million patients receiving treatment (eg surgery or radiotherapy) they did not need.

    Continue reading...
    • tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • chevron_right

      Weighing up the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening | Letters

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian • 11 December 2025

    Aamir Ahmed , Dr Graham Simpson , Adrian Bell and David Gollancz respond to a letter by a reader whose husband died of the disease after delaying getting a PSA test

    It is understandable for patients suffering from a late diagnosis of prostate cancer, or families who have lost loved ones, to demand that something should be done ( Letters, 5 December ). I, however, respect the UK National Screening Committee’s recommendation not to screen most men using the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test.

    The job of the committee was to weigh up the benefits and harms of any available test for routine screening. PSA testing, as a first step to diagnose cancer, results in false negatives and a significant number of false positives, meaning it has both low sensitivity and low specificity, making it a poor screening marker. PSA screening has been conducted in the US; there are varying estimates that, over three decades, it has resulted in more than 1 million patients receiving treatment (eg surgery or radiotherapy) they did not need.

    Continue reading...
    • tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • chevron_right

      House of Lords’ block on assisted dying bill is a big risk | Letter

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian • 11 December 2025

    Defying the will of the House of Commons will increase calls for radical reform of the upper house sooner rather than later, say the MPs Nia Griffith, Justin Madders and Debbie Abrahams

    When visitors come to parliament, it seems incongruous to explain that, in our mother of parliaments, we have a second chamber – the House of Lords – which is unelected. Those who support its existence in its current or similar form justify it on the grounds that it performs a useful revising function which can improve the detail of legislation, and it undoubtedly does good work.

    But the fact that it is unelected can only be tolerated in a democracy provided its members accept that it is for the House of Commons to have the last word on what becomes law and what doesn’t in this country.

    Continue reading...
    • taghouse of lords taghouse of lords taghouse of lords tagassisted dying tagassisted dying tagassisted dying taglords reform taglords reform taglords reform tagnia griffith tagnia griffith tagnia griffith taglaw taglaw taglaw tagpolitics tagpolitics tagpolitics tagsociety tagsociety tagsociety taguk news taguk news taguk news taghouse of lords taghouse of lords taghouse of lords tagassisted dying tagassisted dying tagassisted dying taglords reform taglords reform taglords reform tagnia griffith tagnia griffith tagnia griffith taglaw taglaw taglaw tagpolitics tagpolitics tagpolitics tagsociety tagsociety tagsociety taguk news taguk news taguk news taghouse of lords taghouse of lords taghouse of lords tagassisted dying tagassisted dying tagassisted dying taglords reform taglords reform taglords reform tagnia griffith tagnia griffith tagnia griffith taglaw taglaw taglaw tagpolitics tagpolitics tagpolitics tagsociety tagsociety tagsociety taguk news taguk news taguk news

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • chevron_right

      House of Lords’ block on assisted dying bill is a big risk | Letter

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian • 11 December 2025

    Defying the will of the House of Commons will increase calls for radical reform of the upper house sooner rather than later, say the MPs Nia Griffith, Justin Madders and Debbie Abrahams

    When visitors come to parliament, it seems incongruous to explain that, in our mother of parliaments, we have a second chamber – the House of Lords – which is unelected. Those who support its existence in its current or similar form justify it on the grounds that it performs a useful revising function which can improve the detail of legislation, and it undoubtedly does good work.

    But the fact that it is unelected can only be tolerated in a democracy provided its members accept that it is for the House of Commons to have the last word on what becomes law and what doesn’t in this country.

    Continue reading...
    • taghouse of lords taghouse of lords taghouse of lords tagassisted dying tagassisted dying tagassisted dying taglords reform taglords reform taglords reform tagnia griffith tagnia griffith tagnia griffith taglaw taglaw taglaw tagpolitics tagpolitics tagpolitics tagsociety tagsociety tagsociety taguk news taguk news taguk news taghouse of lords taghouse of lords taghouse of lords tagassisted dying tagassisted dying tagassisted dying taglords reform taglords reform taglords reform tagnia griffith tagnia griffith tagnia griffith taglaw taglaw taglaw tagpolitics tagpolitics tagpolitics tagsociety tagsociety tagsociety taguk news taguk news taguk news taghouse of lords taghouse of lords taghouse of lords tagassisted dying tagassisted dying tagassisted dying taglords reform taglords reform taglords reform tagnia griffith tagnia griffith tagnia griffith taglaw taglaw taglaw tagpolitics tagpolitics tagpolitics tagsociety tagsociety tagsociety taguk news taguk news taguk news

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • chevron_right

      House of Lords’ block on assisted dying bill is a big risk | Letter

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian • 11 December 2025

    Defying the will of the House of Commons will increase calls for radical reform of the upper house sooner rather than later, say the MPs Nia Griffith, Justin Madders and Debbie Abrahams

    When visitors come to parliament, it seems incongruous to explain that, in our mother of parliaments, we have a second chamber – the House of Lords – which is unelected. Those who support its existence in its current or similar form justify it on the grounds that it performs a useful revising function which can improve the detail of legislation, and it undoubtedly does good work.

    But the fact that it is unelected can only be tolerated in a democracy provided its members accept that it is for the House of Commons to have the last word on what becomes law and what doesn’t in this country.

    Continue reading...
    • taghouse of lords taghouse of lords taghouse of lords tagassisted dying tagassisted dying tagassisted dying taglords reform taglords reform taglords reform tagnia griffith tagnia griffith tagnia griffith taglaw taglaw taglaw tagpolitics tagpolitics tagpolitics tagsociety tagsociety tagsociety taguk news taguk news taguk news taghouse of lords taghouse of lords taghouse of lords tagassisted dying tagassisted dying tagassisted dying taglords reform taglords reform taglords reform tagnia griffith tagnia griffith tagnia griffith taglaw taglaw taglaw tagpolitics tagpolitics tagpolitics tagsociety tagsociety tagsociety taguk news taguk news taguk news taghouse of lords taghouse of lords taghouse of lords tagassisted dying tagassisted dying tagassisted dying taglords reform taglords reform taglords reform tagnia griffith tagnia griffith tagnia griffith taglaw taglaw taglaw tagpolitics tagpolitics tagpolitics tagsociety tagsociety tagsociety taguk news taguk news taguk news

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
  • history

    Get older posts

  • cloud_queue

    Powered by Movim