• progress_activity cloud_sync

    Reconnection to the server…

    Movim cannot talk with the server, please try again later

  • back_to_tab fullscreen tile_small dialpad mic videocam switch_camera screen_share

    mic_none No sound detected from your microphone


    • The Guardian

      The need for independent journalism has never been greater.

      article 10000 posts • people 438 subscribers
      assignment_ind Only publishers can publish


    • Public subscriptions

    • chevron_right

      masterscreation

    • chevron_right

      Ai Yu

    • chevron_right

      metalshadow1909

    • chevron_right

      masterscreation

    • chevron_right

      Ai Yu

    • chevron_right

      metalshadow1909

    • chevron_right

      masterscreation

    • chevron_right

      Ai Yu

    • chevron_right

      metalshadow1909

  • Register Login

    Movim

    movim.chatterboxtown.us


  • rss_feed
    add Follow

    The Guardian

    people 438 subscribers • The need for independent journalism has never been greater.

    • chevron_right

      Weighing up the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening | Letters

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian • 11 December 2025

    Aamir Ahmed , Dr Graham Simpson , Adrian Bell and David Gollancz respond to a letter by a reader whose husband died of the disease after delaying getting a PSA test

    It is understandable for patients suffering from a late diagnosis of prostate cancer, or families who have lost loved ones, to demand that something should be done ( Letters, 5 December ). I, however, respect the UK National Screening Committee’s recommendation not to screen most men using the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test.

    The job of the committee was to weigh up the benefits and harms of any available test for routine screening. PSA testing, as a first step to diagnose cancer, results in false negatives and a significant number of false positives, meaning it has both low sensitivity and low specificity, making it a poor screening marker. PSA screening has been conducted in the US; there are varying estimates that, over three decades, it has resulted in more than 1 million patients receiving treatment (eg surgery or radiotherapy) they did not need.

    Continue reading...
    • tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • chevron_right

      Weighing up the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening | Letters

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian • 11 December 2025

    Aamir Ahmed , Dr Graham Simpson , Adrian Bell and David Gollancz respond to a letter by a reader whose husband died of the disease after delaying getting a PSA test

    It is understandable for patients suffering from a late diagnosis of prostate cancer, or families who have lost loved ones, to demand that something should be done ( Letters, 5 December ). I, however, respect the UK National Screening Committee’s recommendation not to screen most men using the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test.

    The job of the committee was to weigh up the benefits and harms of any available test for routine screening. PSA testing, as a first step to diagnose cancer, results in false negatives and a significant number of false positives, meaning it has both low sensitivity and low specificity, making it a poor screening marker. PSA screening has been conducted in the US; there are varying estimates that, over three decades, it has resulted in more than 1 million patients receiving treatment (eg surgery or radiotherapy) they did not need.

    Continue reading...
    • tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • chevron_right

      Weighing up the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening | Letters

      news.movim.eu / TheGuardian • 11 December 2025

    Aamir Ahmed , Dr Graham Simpson , Adrian Bell and David Gollancz respond to a letter by a reader whose husband died of the disease after delaying getting a PSA test

    It is understandable for patients suffering from a late diagnosis of prostate cancer, or families who have lost loved ones, to demand that something should be done ( Letters, 5 December ). I, however, respect the UK National Screening Committee’s recommendation not to screen most men using the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test.

    The job of the committee was to weigh up the benefits and harms of any available test for routine screening. PSA testing, as a first step to diagnose cancer, results in false negatives and a significant number of false positives, meaning it has both low sensitivity and low specificity, making it a poor screening marker. PSA screening has been conducted in the US; there are varying estimates that, over three decades, it has resulted in more than 1 million patients receiving treatment (eg surgery or radiotherapy) they did not need.

    Continue reading...
    • tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer tagprostate cancer taghealth taghealth taghealth taguk news taguk news taguk news tagdoctors tagdoctors tagdoctors tagcancer tagcancer tagcancer tagmen's health tagmen's health tagmen's health tagnhs tagnhs tagnhs

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
  • cloud_queue

    Powered by Movim