• progress_activity cloud_sync

    Reconnection to the server…

    Movim cannot talk with the server, please try again later

  • back_to_tab fullscreen tile_small dialpad mic videocam switch_camera screen_share

    mic_none No sound detected from your microphone


    • Public subscriptions

    • chevron_right

      coopr8

    • chevron_right

      gabagoo

    • chevron_right

      kenu_demon

    • chevron_right

      coopr8

    • chevron_right

      gabagoo

    • chevron_right

      kenu_demon

    • chevron_right

      coopr8

    • chevron_right

      gabagoo

    • chevron_right

      kenu_demon

  • Register Login

    Movim

    movim.chatterboxtown.us


  • group_work rss_feed
    add Follow

    ArsTechnica

    • Ar chevron_right

      Nintendo imposes new limits on sharing for digital Switch games

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica • 30 April 2025 • 1 minute

    In advance of the Switch 2's planned June launch, Nintendo has released a system update for the original Switch that, among other things, activates the company's new Virtual Game Card system for sharing digital downloads. But Switch owners are finding that this new sharing system is a bit more limiting when it comes to sharing a single digital purchase for online play across multiple consoles.

    For those who missed Nintendo's March announcement of the Virtual Game Card system , the new setup allows players to easily "unload" a digital game license from one Switch (or Switch 2) console and "load" it onto another console connected to the same Nintendo Account (or one in the same family group ). An Internet connection is required for the initial loading and unloading process, but after that, the system with the Virtual Game Card can play the downloaded game completely offline.

    For those who don't want to constantly load and unload their virtual games between systems, Nintendo also offers an "Online License" feature deep in the Switch's system menu. When this feature is turned on, if you load a digital game without a Virtual Game Card present, the Switch will perform an online check to confirm that your Nintendo Account actually has access to that game. Nintendo recommends this feature for players who want to share games across three or more Switch units.

    Read full article

    Comments

    • taggaming taggaming taggaming tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 taggaming taggaming taggaming tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 taggaming taggaming taggaming tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • Ar chevron_right

      Nintendo imposes new limits on sharing for digital Switch games

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica • 30 April 2025 • 1 minute

    In advance of the Switch 2's planned June launch, Nintendo has released a system update for the original Switch that, among other things, activates the company's new Virtual Game Card system for sharing digital downloads. But Switch owners are finding that this new sharing system is a bit more limiting when it comes to sharing a single digital purchase for online play across multiple consoles.

    For those who missed Nintendo's March announcement of the Virtual Game Card system , the new setup allows players to easily "unload" a digital game license from one Switch (or Switch 2) console and "load" it onto another console connected to the same Nintendo Account (or one in the same family group ). An Internet connection is required for the initial loading and unloading process, but after that, the system with the Virtual Game Card can play the downloaded game completely offline.

    For those who don't want to constantly load and unload their virtual games between systems, Nintendo also offers an "Online License" feature deep in the Switch's system menu. When this feature is turned on, if you load a digital game without a Virtual Game Card present, the Switch will perform an online check to confirm that your Nintendo Account actually has access to that game. Nintendo recommends this feature for players who want to share games across three or more Switch units.

    Read full article

    Comments

    • taggaming taggaming taggaming tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 taggaming taggaming taggaming tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 taggaming taggaming taggaming tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • Ar chevron_right

      Nintendo imposes new limits on sharing for digital Switch games

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica • 30 April 2025 • 1 minute

    In advance of the Switch 2's planned June launch, Nintendo has released a system update for the original Switch that, among other things, activates the company's new Virtual Game Card system for sharing digital downloads. But Switch owners are finding that this new sharing system is a bit more limiting when it comes to sharing a single digital purchase for online play across multiple consoles.

    For those who missed Nintendo's March announcement of the Virtual Game Card system , the new setup allows players to easily "unload" a digital game license from one Switch (or Switch 2) console and "load" it onto another console connected to the same Nintendo Account (or one in the same family group ). An Internet connection is required for the initial loading and unloading process, but after that, the system with the Virtual Game Card can play the downloaded game completely offline.

    For those who don't want to constantly load and unload their virtual games between systems, Nintendo also offers an "Online License" feature deep in the Switch's system menu. When this feature is turned on, if you load a digital game without a Virtual Game Card present, the Switch will perform an online check to confirm that your Nintendo Account actually has access to that game. Nintendo recommends this feature for players who want to share games across three or more Switch units.

    Read full article

    Comments

    • taggaming taggaming taggaming tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 taggaming taggaming taggaming tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 taggaming taggaming taggaming tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2 tagnintendo switch 2

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • Ar chevron_right

      After convincing senators he supports Artemis, Isaacman nomination advances

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica • 30 April 2025

    The US Senate Commerce Committee on Wednesday advanced the nomination of private astronaut and businessman Jared Isaacman as the next administrator of NASA to the Senate floor, setting up the final step before he is confirmed.

    The vote was not unanimous, at 19–9, with all of the nay votes coming from senators on the Democratic side of the aisle.

    However, some key Democrats voted in favor of Isaacman, including the ranking member of the committee, Maria Cantwell, D-Wash. Before the vote, Cantwell said she appreciated that a candidate like Isaacman, with his background in business and private spaceflight, could bring new ideas and energy to the space agency.

    Read full article

    Comments

    • tagspace tagspace tagspace tagisaacman tagisaacman tagisaacman tagnasa tagnasa tagnasa tagspace tagspace tagspace tagisaacman tagisaacman tagisaacman tagnasa tagnasa tagnasa tagspace tagspace tagspace tagisaacman tagisaacman tagisaacman tagnasa tagnasa tagnasa

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • Ar chevron_right

      After convincing senators he supports Artemis, Isaacman nomination advances

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica • 30 April 2025

    The US Senate Commerce Committee on Wednesday advanced the nomination of private astronaut and businessman Jared Isaacman as the next administrator of NASA to the Senate floor, setting up the final step before he is confirmed.

    The vote was not unanimous, at 19–9, with all of the nay votes coming from senators on the Democratic side of the aisle.

    However, some key Democrats voted in favor of Isaacman, including the ranking member of the committee, Maria Cantwell, D-Wash. Before the vote, Cantwell said she appreciated that a candidate like Isaacman, with his background in business and private spaceflight, could bring new ideas and energy to the space agency.

    Read full article

    Comments

    • tagspace tagspace tagspace tagisaacman tagisaacman tagisaacman tagnasa tagnasa tagnasa tagspace tagspace tagspace tagisaacman tagisaacman tagisaacman tagnasa tagnasa tagnasa tagspace tagspace tagspace tagisaacman tagisaacman tagisaacman tagnasa tagnasa tagnasa

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • Ar chevron_right

      After convincing senators he supports Artemis, Isaacman nomination advances

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica • 30 April 2025

    The US Senate Commerce Committee on Wednesday advanced the nomination of private astronaut and businessman Jared Isaacman as the next administrator of NASA to the Senate floor, setting up the final step before he is confirmed.

    The vote was not unanimous, at 19–9, with all of the nay votes coming from senators on the Democratic side of the aisle.

    However, some key Democrats voted in favor of Isaacman, including the ranking member of the committee, Maria Cantwell, D-Wash. Before the vote, Cantwell said she appreciated that a candidate like Isaacman, with his background in business and private spaceflight, could bring new ideas and energy to the space agency.

    Read full article

    Comments

    • tagspace tagspace tagspace tagisaacman tagisaacman tagisaacman tagnasa tagnasa tagnasa tagspace tagspace tagspace tagisaacman tagisaacman tagisaacman tagnasa tagnasa tagnasa tagspace tagspace tagspace tagisaacman tagisaacman tagisaacman tagnasa tagnasa tagnasa

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • Ar chevron_right

      First Amendment doesn’t just protect human speech, chatbot maker argues

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica • 30 April 2025

    Pushing to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that its chatbots caused a teen's suicide , Character Technologies is arguing that chatbot outputs should be considered "pure speech" deserving of the highest degree of protection under the First Amendment.

    In their motion to dismiss , the developers of Character.AI (C.AI) argued that it doesn't matter who the speaker is—whether it's a video game character spouting scripted dialogue, a foreign propagandist circulating misinformation, or a chatbot churning out AI-generated responses to prompting—courts protect listeners' rights to access that speech. Accusing the mother of the departed teen, Megan Garcia, of attempting to "insert this Court into the conversations of millions of C.AI users" and supposedly endeavoring to "shut down" C.AI, the chatbot maker argued that the First Amendment bars all of her claims.

    "The Court need not wrestle with the novel questions of who should be deemed the speaker of the allegedly harmful content here and whether that speaker has First Amendment rights," Character Technologies argued, "because the First Amendment protects the public’s 'right to receive information and ideas.'"

    Read full article

    Comments

    • tagpolicy tagpolicy tagpolicy tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfree speech tagfree speech tagfree speech taggenerative ai taggenerative ai taggenerative ai tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagpolicy tagpolicy tagpolicy tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfree speech tagfree speech tagfree speech taggenerative ai taggenerative ai taggenerative ai tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagpolicy tagpolicy tagpolicy tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfree speech tagfree speech tagfree speech taggenerative ai taggenerative ai taggenerative ai tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagprotected speech

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • Ar chevron_right

      First Amendment doesn’t just protect human speech, chatbot maker argues

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica • 30 April 2025

    Pushing to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that its chatbots caused a teen's suicide , Character Technologies is arguing that chatbot outputs should be considered "pure speech" deserving of the highest degree of protection under the First Amendment.

    In their motion to dismiss , the developers of Character.AI (C.AI) argued that it doesn't matter who the speaker is—whether it's a video game character spouting scripted dialogue, a foreign propagandist circulating misinformation, or a chatbot churning out AI-generated responses to prompting—courts protect listeners' rights to access that speech. Accusing the mother of the departed teen, Megan Garcia, of attempting to "insert this Court into the conversations of millions of C.AI users" and supposedly endeavoring to "shut down" C.AI, the chatbot maker argued that the First Amendment bars all of her claims.

    "The Court need not wrestle with the novel questions of who should be deemed the speaker of the allegedly harmful content here and whether that speaker has First Amendment rights," Character Technologies argued, "because the First Amendment protects the public’s 'right to receive information and ideas.'"

    Read full article

    Comments

    • tagpolicy tagpolicy tagpolicy tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfree speech tagfree speech tagfree speech taggenerative ai taggenerative ai taggenerative ai tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagpolicy tagpolicy tagpolicy tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfree speech tagfree speech tagfree speech taggenerative ai taggenerative ai taggenerative ai tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagpolicy tagpolicy tagpolicy tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfree speech tagfree speech tagfree speech taggenerative ai taggenerative ai taggenerative ai tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagprotected speech

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
    • Ar chevron_right

      First Amendment doesn’t just protect human speech, chatbot maker argues

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica • 30 April 2025

    Pushing to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that its chatbots caused a teen's suicide , Character Technologies is arguing that chatbot outputs should be considered "pure speech" deserving of the highest degree of protection under the First Amendment.

    In their motion to dismiss , the developers of Character.AI (C.AI) argued that it doesn't matter who the speaker is—whether it's a video game character spouting scripted dialogue, a foreign propagandist circulating misinformation, or a chatbot churning out AI-generated responses to prompting—courts protect listeners' rights to access that speech. Accusing the mother of the departed teen, Megan Garcia, of attempting to "insert this Court into the conversations of millions of C.AI users" and supposedly endeavoring to "shut down" C.AI, the chatbot maker argued that the First Amendment bars all of her claims.

    "The Court need not wrestle with the novel questions of who should be deemed the speaker of the allegedly harmful content here and whether that speaker has First Amendment rights," Character Technologies argued, "because the First Amendment protects the public’s 'right to receive information and ideas.'"

    Read full article

    Comments

    • tagpolicy tagpolicy tagpolicy tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfree speech tagfree speech tagfree speech taggenerative ai taggenerative ai taggenerative ai tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagpolicy tagpolicy tagpolicy tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfree speech tagfree speech tagfree speech taggenerative ai taggenerative ai taggenerative ai tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagpolicy tagpolicy tagpolicy tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagartificial intelligence tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter technologies tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagcharacter.ai tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchatbots tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagchild safety online tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfirst amendment tagfree speech tagfree speech tagfree speech taggenerative ai taggenerative ai taggenerative ai tagprotected speech tagprotected speech tagprotected speech

    • Pictures 3 image

    • visibility
    • visibility
    • visibility
  • history

    Get older posts

  • cloud_queue

    Powered by Movim